Minutes of the Tracker Technical Meeting November 22, 2000 The meeting started with a general discussion on the coordination of having the panels built in Italy. The cost of the carbon/carbon closeouts was estimated, by Hytec, to be $8K for the first order, or about $700 a panel, and for the production run the cost would drop to about $400 a panel. The web site for Hytec was sent to Pisa so that they could access the preliminary drawings of the panels. During next week's meeting there will be a discussion on the best time for Tom and Steve Nye to visit Pisa and discuss the panel design with the Italian vendors, after Pisa has some time to look at the drawings. Pisa is planning on 8 mock-ups. Four mock-ups will be fabricated now consisting of just core and face sheets and four more will be fabricated using carbon/carbon closeouts and 6 ply face sheets early next year. Eric will look into the cost and schedule of additional carbon/carbon closeouts to support these mock-ups. The delivery date of the 6 ply face sheets is currently 12/26/00. Pisa asked for more information on the Nusil adhesive - Ossie to forward as soon as possible. Ossie announced that the tungsten converter material for the mock ups was in house. They are 5 mil and 25 mil thick, whereas the design is now 4 and 25. A general discussion on the sizing of the converters to the flight dimensions was held. Tom is getting a 1-piece tungsten converter priced, including costs for integrating it into an aramid-fiber bias circuit. He noted that the aramid material is about 3 times more expensive than polyimide, with a finished board being about double the cost of polyimide. Tom is to forward the spread sheet with the tracker dimensions to Italy and UCSC. Review of the Pisa drawings (later in the day): GLAST Ladder assembly fixture: - Ossie was concerned about the large amount of machining on one side relative to the other. He said that this could cause the resulting piece not to be flat. - Ossie stated our requirement that there be no contact of metal with the Si detectors. The edge that the ladder is pushed up against for alignment should be teflon also. - Ossie suggested that the contact points for the detector edges, for alignment, should also be radiused, and that the contact area should be relatively small, to minimize the probability of grit getting in and disturbing the alignment. John noted that in his design the round pins give a natural lead-in to the contact point. He machined them to a slight flat just to ensure straightness of the ladder edge. - John noted that the chips need to be supported near the edges where the detector-to-detector bonding takes place. The problem is that the Si wafers tend to be bowed, so if they are supported in the center one gets vertical steps at the glue joints. - Gwelen suggested that we would like to keep small the exposted horizontal contact surface also to minimize the chance of grit getting on the surface and scratching the detectors. Ossie said that one source of such grit is chips from the sawn edges of the Si wafers. The clean-room filtration won't help with that. - Ossie brought up his idea to use "Gelpac" for the vacuum contacts. This stuff holds onto the detectors and requires vacuum only to release it. That way one does not need vacuum lines in the way when carrying the fixture from one workstation to the next, for example. - It was noted that John's design has the 4 vacuum valves built into the fixture, so that only one vacuum hose needs to be attached. - Gwelen expressed concern about the edge clamping force. John's design uses spring clamps that are force limited. Box for wire bonding, testing, and encapsulation of ladders: - SLAC and UCSC pointed out the utility of the dovetail edge on the existing fixtures, which allows quick mounting into wire bonders, test stations, encapsulation station, etc. - Ossie thought that in general the design looks more complex than necessary (compared with the existing fixtures). - We could not understand from the drawing the cover arrangement. - In the existing fixtures the electrical test circuit is a separate piece, which might be considered to save money in the new design. Bridge: - There was concern that it might not be stiff enough for its weight.